Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

Contact

Call me back

Advice

Back

Email us

Regional Managers Rankings

Rank Region Glacier SILSS
Value of flows to SI Market Share Value of flows to SI Market Share
1 East Vaal R 164 381 079 18.1% R 24 476 258 16.3%
2 Mopani R 59 771 939 27.1% R 28 584 294 48.8%
3 Cheeqwa R 75 123 603 11.8% R 50 573 695 26.2%
4 Jacaranda R 89 853 667 11.3% R 22 390 731 32.5%
4 South Durban R 71 704 500 14.1% R 23 611 288 26.8%
6 Limpopo Legacy R 29 286 560 23.2% R 42 664 252 62.0%
7 Tygerberg R 79 229 970 15.6% R 12 046 748 41.6%
8 Invictus Johannesburg R 85 822 645 20.2% R 16 754 959 11.0%
9 Capestorm R 61 942 750 11.7% R 19 414 103 21.9%
10 Two Oceans R 42 313 411 13.9% R 16 210 030 26.4%
Rank Region Glacier SILSS
Value of flows to SI Market Share Value of flows to SI Market Share
1 MOPANI R 51 734 845 27.1% R 26 428 645 47.5%
2 EAST VAAL R 117 413 778 15.1% R 20 478 616 15.1%
3 CHEEQWA R 64 128 103 11.1% R 40 110 082 23.5%
3 JACARANDA R 78 109 840 11.0% R 18 917 960 31.9%
3 SOUTH DURBAN R 57 367 361 12.5% R 22 417 140 26.2%
6 TYGERBERG R 64 191 839 14.6% R 11 987 638 43.2%
6 INVICTUS JOHANNESBURG R 74 313 418 18.9% R 16 062 539 11.2%
8 CAPESTORM R 52 000 926 10.7% R 18 616 374 21.7%
8 LIMPOPO LEGACY R 33 821 347 60.1% R 16 225 620 16.2%
10 INVICTUS DURBAN R 31 154 701 6.6% R 21 708 382 23.6%
Rank Region Glacier SILSS
Value of flows to SI Market Share Value of flows to SI Market Share
1 East Vaal R 93 123 179 13.6% R 18 175 480 14.9%
2 Cheeqwa R 53 902 164 10.1% R 33 181 516 21.3%
3 Mopani R 39 259 339 25.7% R 17 864 303 42.0%
4 Jacaranda R 68 131 793 11.1% R 16 175 261 30.8%
5 Invictus Johannesburg R 58 445 102 15.6% R 15 572 205 12.6%
6 Tygerberg R 51 706 683 13.7% R 10 905 018 42.7%
7 'North Kzn R 11 110 068 11.7% R 20 314 596 48.0%
8 Capestorm R 43 438 523 10.0% R 17 018 809 21.1%
9 South Durban R 40 338 615 9.9% R 17 627 292 24.6%
10 Limpopo Legacy R 10 801 545 12.1% R 20 002 962 48.1%
Rank Region Glacier SILSS
Value of flows to SI Market Share Value of flows to SI Market Share
1 Cheeqwa R 46 314 008 10.4% R 22 315 567 17.1%
2 Jacaranda R 61 130 369 12.4% R 12 353 782 28.7%
3 Mopani R 26 418 722 23.7% R 16 506 988 41.7%
4 East Vaal R 75 243 823 12.6% R 11 356 744 16.0%
5 Limpopo Legacy R 11 171 022 16.3% R 17 994 060 47.1%
6 Tygerberg R 41 988 509 11.9% R 10 416 001 43.0%
7 South Durban R 28 931 897 13.0% R 11 377 293 22.0%
8 Capestorm R 29 123 511 8.7% R 14 175 010 23.1%
9 Cape Focus R 22 802 856 9.1% R 12 896 119 31.9%
10 Port Elizabeth R 34 593 013 11.1% R 10 852 610 14.5%
10 Invictus Johannesburg R 48 426 564 14.3% R 9 259 018 8.9%
Rank Region Glacier SILSS
Value of flows to SI Market Share Value of flows to SI Market Share
1 Cheeqwa R 36 977 918 9.9% R 19 716 687 17.7%
2 Jacaranda R 46 363 223 10.9% R 10 507 729 29.3%
3 East Vaal R 58 710 052 12.0% R 10 254 912 17.2%
3 Mopani R 13 203 100 17.2% R 15 675 522 44.2%
5 Tygerberg R 30 849 071 10.6% R 6 930 265 35.0%
6 Capestorm R 20 641 428 8.6% R 11 809 333 22.9%
7 Port Elizabeth R 28 104 710 11.0% R 9 440 932 17.1%
8 North KZN R 8 101 180 12.6% R 14 835 697 52.6%
8 South Durban R 17 419 483 10.0% R 9 091 710 21.1%
8 Limpopo Legacy R 8 322 919 14.1% R 11 876 453 40.2%
Rank Region Glacier SILSS
Value of flows to SI Market Share Value of flows to SI Market Share
1 CHEEQWA R 34 097 291 11.8% R 15 341 715 18.4%
2 PORT ELIZABETH R 24 844 698 12.2% R 8 941 813 22.0%
2 EAST VAAL R 89 985 731 22.5% R 7 229 290 16.4%
4 CAPESTORM R 19 777 678 11.1% R 9 273 158 25.3%
4 TYGERBERG R 36 772 749 17.4% R 5 858 030 36.6%
6 NORTH WEST R 18 915 790 16.2% R 6 346 402 31.1%
6 MOPANI R 11 502 622 25.3% R 7 268 847 40.3%
8 JACARANDA R 56 076 620 17.0% R 4 144 516 20.2%
8 LIMPOPO LEGACY R 7 791 794 16.1% R 11 000 302 40.2%
10 NORTH KZN R 6 222 824 11.0% R 11 577 033 52.0%
Rank Region Glacier SILSS
Value of flows to SI Market Share Value of flows to SI Market Share
1 CHEEQWA R 17 820 262 9.7% R 8 350 241 19.4%
2 TYGERBERG R 22 940 884 17.6% R 3 635 815 41.7%
3 PORT ELIZABE R 13 159 853 11.6% R 7 199 965 23.3%
4 EAST VAAL R 71 728 616 26.4% R 3 518 909 13.0%
4 NORTH WEST R 13 493 170 20.2% R 3 588 161 32.0%
6 JACARANDA R 25 695 962 16.6% R 2 847 766 19.3%
6 MOPANI R 10 846 504 28.1% R 2 584 781 36.7%
8 CAPESTORM R 13 201 220 10.7% R 3 339 730 19.3%
8 DUNKELD R 6 560 153 13.8% R 3 819 355 68.6%
10 TSHWANE R 3 051 172 5.5% R 8 476 556 25.2%
10 SOUTH DURBAN R 7 324 060 9.1% R 3 961 266 20.2%
10 LIMPOPO LEGACY R 5 240 021 15.85% R 4 244 469 24.6%

© 2018 Sanlam. All rights reserved.

The Sanlam Investments Cluster consists of the following authorised Financial Services Providers: Sanlam Investment Management (Pty) Ltd (“SIM”), Sanlam Multi Manager International (Pty) Ltd (“SMMI"), Satrix Managers (Pty) Ltd (SATRIX), Graviton Wealth Management (Pty) Ltd, and Graviton Financial Partners (Pty) Ltd, Blue Ink Investments (Pty) Ltd and Sanlam Capital Markets (Pty) Ltd (SCM) and has the following approved Management Companies under the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act: Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) (Pty) Ltd and Satrix Managers (RF) (Pty) Ltd.


The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium- to long-term investments. Please note that past performances are not necessarily an accurate determination of future performances, and that the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available from the Manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd & Satrix Managers (RF) (Pty) Ltd, a registered and approved Manager in Collective Investment Schemes in Securities. Additional information of the proposed investment, including brochures, application forms and annual or quarterly reports, can be obtained from the Manager, free of charge. Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in the portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of the portfolio and the investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, and the date of reinvestment of income as well as dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used. The Manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. The performance of the portfolio depends on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-div date. Lump sum investment performances are quoted. The portfolio may invest in other unit trust portfolios which levy their own fees, and may result is a higher fee structure for our portfolio. All the portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No 45 of 2002 (“CISCA”). The fund may from time to time invest in foreign instruments which could be accompanied by additional risks as well as potential limitations on the availability of market information. The Manager has the right to close any portfolios to new investors to manage them more efficiently in accordance with their mandates.
The portfolio management of all the portfolios is outsourced to financial services providers authorized in terms of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 2002. Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd is the appointed trustee of the Sanlam Collective Investments Scheme & Standard Chartered Bank is the appointed trustee of the Satrix Managers Scheme.

Sanlam Life Insurance is a licensed financial service provider.
Copyright © Sanlam