1. Drive further emphasis on E and S issues
Recent studies confirm a wide divergence in how asset managers address critical E and S issues through proxy voting, with the United States falling behind its peers in the United Kingdom and Europe. Unfortunately, South Africa is behind the curve too.
I have seen some growth in shareholder proposals relating to climate policies and social issues over the past three years, but local asset managers need to pay more attention to financially material E and S issues. I would like to see stronger focuses on the climate agenda (lowering carbon emissions), particularly in driving the just transition and biodiversity, and on improving board quality through a diversity of experience, gender, race and skills.
Increased investor awareness and policy, along with better disclosure practice and compliance to reporting frameworks from investee companies, will enable more positive and dynamic E and S agenda outcomes.
2. Use technology to improve shareholder activism
The rise in the number of virtual shareholder annual general meetings that came about due to the COVID-19 pandemic makes it easier for asset managers and investors to engage in shareholder activism. However, challenges do remain.
Collaboration can foster stewardship activities to open engagement with boards of investee companies in a more fluid and scalable fashion. Attendance levels at company AGMs have also increased due to being more accessible through virtual platforms.
Increasingly accommodative corporate governance codes, access to improving technology like e-voting, better shareholder identification practices and safer cyber-security protocols spur the rise of virtual forums.
While these promote arguably easier and more efficient interactions, the dynamism of an in-person engagement, dealing transparently with larger volumes of posed questioning, and maintaining levels of trust with the shareholder collective must not be compromised.
3. Complementary focus on investment processes, governance and reporting
There is growing evidence to support that active engagement, combined with a sensible approach to proxy voting, can achieve real E and S change. Asset managers are able to leverage their influence and shareholdings to improve the board’s focus and attention to better profitability and impact outcomes.
Complementary investment of discipline, time and expertise in our investment processes (integration, data, technology, research), reporting and governance areas toward global best practice is crucial.
A recent study of 2021 proxy voting shows that investors voted against 10% of all resolutions under categories such as access to capital; audit; corporate activity; directors’ re-election and/or remuneration; and others. This means there is plenty of scope for local asset managers and investors to get more involved in standing against resolutions that divert from ESG outcomes, especially if they follow the lead set by the global investment community.
The second annual Robeco Global Climate Survey (Q1 2022) confirmed that 80% of global investors believe that active stakeholder engagement should be a significant part of their investment policy, with 72% indicating that such engagement was “quite or very effective” in fostering change and progress on ESG policies at investee firms. While not at these heady levels, the annual Sanlam Benchmark Survey among local client and investor base emphasised an improving appreciation of this over time.